EN
Español
Português (Brasil)
Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Polski
Čeština
Română
Slovenčina
Magyar1 Nov 2026
Solana's Agave client leaves the commission-rate field empty in reward records once custom collectors are active, so stakers can still see their SOL rewards but can no longer read the applied validator fee from the payout itself. Staking provider P2P.org says commission is still charged and rewards still reconcile.
Altcoins TradeReviewed News Desk
Solana staking commission data has become harder to verify. According to CryptoSlate, the Agave validator client now leaves the commission-rate field empty in reward metadata when custom collectors are active. Stakers still see the SOL they receive, but the fee rate behind each payout is no longer recorded next to it.
What changed in Agave
The change came with Agave pull request #12588, merged on May 20. It empties the commission field after activation of the custom-collector feature, both for accumulated validator commission rewards and for individual stake rewards. In an October 30 report, staking provider P2P.org said the commission record disappeared from voting and staking rewards from September 8. P2P.org also said commission continued to be charged and reward amounts still reconciled, so the issue is missing evidence rather than a known shortfall. P2P.org sells staking and reporting services, so it has a commercial interest in the topic.
An empty field does not mean a validator charged zero commission. The feature, defined in SIMD-0232, lets validators send commission income to designated collection accounts, and the developers argue that one rate no longer describes an aggregated reward.
Why the latest rate can be the wrong rate
Under the SIMD-0249 rule, a rate change takes effect with a delay across epochs. Rewards earned in epoch E use the rate captured at the start of epoch E-1 and are calculated at the start of E+1. That means the rate shown in a validator’s current account can differ from the rate that applied to an older payout. An open Agave RPC request from October 18 asks for an optional response showing the effective inflation commission, its epoch and slot. As of October 30 it had no linked implementation.
Workarounds exist. Jito’s Validator History Program stores up to 512 epochs of validator history including commission, Marinade publishes a snapshot parser that extracts the inflation commission with its vintage, and Trillium measures delegator returns from stake-account growth without relying on displayed commission.
What it means for traders
- Check net yield, not only the advertised fee. Compare stake-account growth over several epochs with what your validator promises.
- Keep your own records. Tax and accounting tools may show a blank commission rate for recent SOL rewards.
- No overcharging has been identified. The reports describe a transparency gap, not lost funds.
If you stake SOL through an exchange instead of running your own delegation, compare products and fees in our exchange comparison, where BingX ranks first and OKX second.
This article is for information only and is not financial advice.
Follow TradeReviewed on X and our Telegram channel: you hear crypto and trading news here first.
Related reviews
Sources
News is for information only and is not financial advice. More crypto news
You'll hear it here first
Get crypto news first on our Telegram channel.